At The Post, we believe in open dialogue and accountability. We strive to publish accurate and fair journalism, and we take concerns about our reporting seriously. To that end, we’re announcing a new policy regarding correspondence related to potential defamation.
Going forward, all letters and formal communications received by The Post concerning allegations of defamation in our published content will be published online at “Defamation Concerns“. This includes, but is not limited to, letters before action, concerns notices, and formal complaints.
We believe this policy is crucial for several reasons:
Transparency: Publishing these communications allows our readers to see firsthand the nature of any complaints we receive and how we respond to them. This transparency fosters trust and allows for a more informed public discourse.
Accountability: This policy holds us accountable for the accuracy and fairness of our reporting. It also provides a platform for individuals or organizations to voice their concerns publicly.
Open Dialogue: Publishing these communications encourages open dialogue about important issues and allows for a fuller understanding of the context surrounding any potential defamation claims.
It’s important to note that publication online does not constitute an admission of wrongdoing on the part of The Post. It simply reflects our commitment to transparency and open communication. We will continue to thoroughly investigate all complaints we receive and respond appropriately.
In addition to online publication, The Post reserves the right, at the editor’s sole discretion, to publish these letters and communications, or excerpts thereof, in the print edition of the newsmagazine. This decision will be based on factors such as the newsworthiness of the complaint, the public interest in the matter, and space constraints. We will, of course, ensure that any published material is presented fairly and accurately.
We understand that some individuals or organizations may be hesitant to communicate their concerns knowing they will be published. However, we believe that the benefits of transparency and open dialogue outweigh any potential drawbacks. We are confident that this new policy will enhance our commitment to responsible journalism and strengthen our relationship with our readers.
We encourage anyone with concerns about potential defamation in our reporting to contact the Editor. We are committed to engaging in constructive dialogue and addressing any legitimate concerns promptly and fairly.
Disclaimer: This blog post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Individuals or organizations with concerns about defamation should consult with their own legal counsel.
